Draft Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006 (Directions to OFCOM) (Revocation) Order 2026

The Committee consisted of the following Members:

Chair: †Dr Andrew Murrison

† Anderson, Callum (Buckingham and Bletchley) (Lab)

† Baines, David (St Helens North) (Lab)

† Ballinger, Alex (Halesowen) (Lab)

† Beavers, Lorraine (Blackpool North and Fleetwood) (Lab)

† Campbell, Irene (North Ayrshire and Arran) (Lab)

† Collins, Victoria (Harpenden and Berkhamsted) (LD)

† Coombes, Sarah (West Bromwich) (Lab)

† Cooper, Andrew (Mid Cheshire) (Lab)

† Dakin, Sir Nicholas (Vice Chamberlain of His Majesty's Household)

† Davies, Jonathan (Mid Derbyshire) (Lab)

† Fortune, Peter (Bromley and Biggin Hill) (Con)

† Frith, Mr James (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology)

† Jopp, Lincoln (Spelthorne) (Con)

† Spencer, Dr Ben (Runnymede and Weybridge) (Con)

Vickers, Martin (Brigg and Immingham) (Con)

† West, Catherine (Hornsey and Friern Barnet) (Lab)

† Wrigley, Martin (Newton Abbot) (LD)

Heather Nathoo and George Stokes, Committee Clerks

† attended the Committee

Fourth Delegated Legislation Committee

Tuesday 30 June 2026

[Dr Andrew Murrison in the Chair]

Draft Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006 (Directions to OFCOM) (Revocation) Order 2026

I beg to move, That the Committee has considered the draft Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006 (Directions to OFCOM) (Revocation) Order 2026.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Dr Murrison. I am grateful to the Committee for considering this instrument today. Wireless connectivity underpins a vast range of everyday services, from mobile phones and wi fi to broadcasting and satellite communications. All of those rely on access to radio spectrum, the invisible frequencies that carry wireless signals.

Spectrum is a finite and valuable resource. It must be carefully managed to ensure that different services can operate without interference, that networks function reliably and that consumers and businesses benefit from competition and innovation. In the UK that is the responsibility of Ofcom, the independent communications regulator, which manages spectrum by issuing licences, setting conditions and promoting efficient use. The Government set the overall policy and strategic priorities, including through the statement of strategic priorities.

Sorry if this is slightly parochial: I welcome the release of spectrum, but what guidance will be given to Ofcom to help with the roll out in semi rural areas such as Biggin Hill in my constituency?

I will conclude my remarks and perhaps pick up that question in my closing speech, which I am looking forward to making.

Maintaining a clear and effective framework for managing spectrum is therefore an important part of supporting investment in digital infrastructure and the wider economy. The instrument contributes to that by improving legal clarity without changing existing services, business models or regulatory requirements.

The draft order revokes a direction given to Ofcom in 2010. At the time, the Government used the direction to ensure that a specific set of reforms to support the roll out of mobile broadband were implemented clearly and at pace alongside Ofcom’s existing statutory framework, and in line with wider European measures to harmonise the use of key spectrum bands. Those measures included allowing operators greater flexibility in how they could use key spectrum bands, enabling spectrum licences to be bought and sold, updating licence conditions to support long term investment and preparing for major spectrum auctions.

Together, those changes helped operators to transition from older mobile technologies towards newer ones, enabling the roll out of 3G and 4G services more quickly and efficiently, and supporting the widespread availability of modern mobile services across the UK. The reforms were also reflected in wider European measures to harmonise the use of key mobile spectrum bands and support the transition to newer technologies. They played a significant role in enabling the roll out of modern mobile networks in the UK and in promoting investment and competition in the sector.

All the obligations set out in the direction have now been fully implemented by Ofcom through a series of regulatory actions over the past decade. As a result, the direction no longer has any practical effect and is now redundant. The instrument therefore revokes that direction, improving the clarity of the legal framework and removing the risk of confusion that could arise from retaining obsolete provisions. For example, when Ofcom looks to set annual licence fees for mobile spectrum, we want to minimise the risk of unnecessary legal challenge.

The instrument does not introduce any new policy or change the way spectrum is managed in the UK. Ofcom will continue to exercise its functions under the existing statutory framework, including the duties set out in the Communications Act 2003 and the powers under the Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006. They provide the framework for managing spectrum efficiently, promoting competition and investment, and protecting consumers. That step helps to ensure that the framework underpinning wireless connectivity remains clear and effective, supporting continued investment, innovation and reliable services for consumers and businesses. I hope the Committee will support this instrument.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Dr Murrison. This statutory instrument revokes an obsolete SI, and we of course support clearing up and removing obsolete instruments. I wish the Government could do more of that in terms of regulation, and I would be grateful if the Minister could provide a list of the SIs that he plans to revoke, amend or remove over the course of the next year.

Many people receive internet coverage through 4G and 3G. He will no doubt be aware that there have recently been quite a few cancellations under Project Gigabit. Can he tell us how many homes will now no longer receive gigabit broadband connections that were expecting to this year?

It is an honour to serve under your chairmanship, Dr Murrison. The Liberal Democrats of course support this instrument; Ofcom has fulfilled its duties under the original direction and the legislative housekeeping is sensible. However, the Minister talks about modern mobile services, innovation and investment, and in light of that it is right to use this opportunity to highlight that for millions of people across the UK, high speed mobile broadband and mobile services remain a distant promise rather than a daily reality.

In my own constituency, just 20 minutes from London, constituents regularly write to me about patchy or non existent mobile coverage. That is not just a problem of rural remoteness; there are people living on streets where their neighbour has full signal and they have none. Michael from Gaddesden Row, for example, has no 4G signal and very slow wi fi, while his neighbours just down the street have double his speed of connection.

I have also heard from many constituents who cannot reliably pay for parking on their own high streets because the connectivity is simply not there. We are happy to support the removal of a direction that has served its purpose, but can the Minister tell me when constituents across the country will genuinely be able to access the high speed mobile broadband infrastructure that this legislation was supposed to help to deliver?

On the first and third questions asked regarding this measure, consumers should not expect an immediate or visible change as a result of the instrument, but the Government will work closely with Ofcom to ensure that mobile coverage is improved through other policy measures. If the shadow Minister will forgive me, on the substantive numbers of gigabit availability—

The cancelled gigabit availability.

Yes, sorry—I will write to him. I am grateful for the support across the House on the draft instrument. The direction it revokes has already been fully implemented in terms of obtaining—

Will the Minister give way?

I will not.

The direction being revoked serves no practical purpose. This SI is therefore a simple but important step to ensure that the statute book reflects the current position by removing provisions that are no longer needed. In doing so, it supports a clear and coherent framework for spectrum management, giving certainty to regulators and industry alike. It helps to maintain the conditions for continued investment, innovation and reliable connectivity across the economy. I commend the order to the Committee.

Question put and agreed to.

Committee rose.