Front Page

About

Opengovt tracks how power is used in Britain.

We record how MPs vote, what they declare, what they earn outside Parliament and what they claim in expenses. We also compare what councils charge residents with what they provide in return.

The record is drawn from named public sources: Hansard for divisions and debates, the Register of Members’ Financial Interests for declarations, House of Commons data for expenses, the Electoral Commission for donations, Companies House for directorships, and government statistics for departmental performance. Each figure links back to where it came from.

MP profiles use caricatures instead of official portraits because politics already comes with enough image management. We are not here to add to it.

Our journalists publish without bylines. The work should stand or fall on whether it is accurate. Every factual claim is checked against a public record before publication; when something is wrong and it is found, it is corrected and the correction is logged.

Readers can also record how they would have voted on the same Commons divisions MPs faced, then compare their choices with their own MP’s.

Opengovt is independent. It is not part of Parliament, GOV.UK or any government body. It takes no government funding and carries no party label.

A note on our name

We changed our name to opengovt in 2026 as a courtesy, to avoid confusion with another organisation.

Ministers Want Three Asylum Camps for a Decade. They Will Not Say How Many Men Each Will Hold.
Three new camps for around 3,750 men, with papers suggesting two could run for at least a decade.

The Home Office is planning three new asylum camps for around 3,750 men, and its own documents say two could run for at least ten years. It still will not say how many men would live at each.

Read the full story →
The MoD Has a Fraud Problem. It Doesn’t Know How Large It Is

The Ministry of Defence refused about £400 million in supplier claims last year and estimates it may be exposed to £1.5 billion of fraud a year, a figure its own officials call an “academic construct”.

Opengovt is an independent record of how the United Kingdom is governed.

Every Member of Parliament has a profile here. Their voting record, their declared earnings, the bills they have sponsored, the hours they spend on second jobs, and a biographical note that reads as a political assessment rather than a press release. Each of the 24 ministerial departments has its own institutional performance report, marked by letter grade, against the public record of what it was set up to do. Every bill since 2010 is tracked through its stages of Parliament: which Members spoke for and against, how the division went on each reading, and whether it became law.

The transparency surfaces sit alongside the formal record. Ministers’ meetings, ministers’ hospitality, the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments, the Register of Members’ Financial Interests, awarded public contracts and political donations are pulled from the public registers daily, indexed by Member and by department, searchable.

The site exists because the public record is real but inaccessible. Every fact on opengovt is drawn from the public record. None of it is invented. None of it is opinion in the sense of being made up. The interpretative judgements in the institutional reports and the political biographies are the editorial work of the project; the underlying record is not.

If something is wrong, it can be corrected. If something is missing, it can be added.