Topics
← All topics

Defence

Defence is where the gap between what politicians promise and what they fund is sharpest. The questions here are about how much the country spends on its armed forces, the state of the nuclear deterrent, support for veterans, the readiness of equipment and personnel, and the commitments Britain makes through NATO and to allies under pressure. War in Europe and instability in the Middle East have pushed defence back up the agenda after decades of cuts, and the decisions taken now will shape what the country can and cannot do for a generation.

The department responsible

Ministry of Defence →

In charge of Britain's armed forces, the nuclear deterrent, and the running argument about whether 2% of GDP is enough.

MPs scrutinising this most

By written questions tabled to the department this Parliament.

1. Ben Obese-Jecty Conservative3,4282. James Cartlidge Conservative3,2593. Stuart Anderson Conservative5044. Rt Hon Mark Francois Conservative4025. James MacCleary Liberal Democrat302

Recent Commons votes

Opposition Day Motion: Defence spending and readiness - Prime Minister's Amendment
23 Jun 2026
Opposition day: Defence spending and readiness
23 Jun 2026
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: Amendment 11
22 Jun 2026
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: New Clause 22
22 Jun 2026
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: New Clause 11
22 Jun 2026
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: New Clause 4
22 Jun 2026
Armed Forces Bill Committee: New Clause 13
2 Jun 2026
Armed Forces Bill Committee: New Clause 6
2 Jun 2026
Armed Forces Bill Committee: New Clause 5
2 Jun 2026
Armed Forces Bill Committee: New Clause 2
2 Jun 2026

Bills and Acts

Armed Forces Bill
Committee stage
Church Appointments (Repeal of Discriminatory Provision) Bill
1st reading
Armed Forces Compensation Scheme and War Pension Scheme (Report) Bill
1st reading
Military Operations Bill
1st reading
United States Military and Security Operations (Oversight) Bill
1st reading
Russian Frozen Assets (Seizure and Aid to Ukraine) Bill
1st reading
Military Action (Parliamentary Approval) (No. 2) Bill
1st reading
Military Action Bill
1st reading

Investigations

MoD Blocked £400m of Supplier Costs but Still Cannot Reliably Estimate Its Fraud Losses →

The Ministry of Defence stopped around £400 million of costs claimed by suppliers in 2024/25 because it judged them invalid. Most were not fraud. But the figure sits beside a problem the MoD has yet to solve: it does not have a reliable estimate of how much money it actually loses to fraud. Its published estimate of £1.5 billion a year was described by the Permanent Secretary as "essentially an academic construct".

MoD Overturned 884 Afghan Special Forces Refusals After Failing to Use Key Records →

The Ministry of Defence eventually overturned 884 refusals involving former members of Afghan specialist units who had worked alongside British forces, after a review found that earlier decisions had been made without properly using records held by the UK government. A Defence Committee report found serious administrative failings and said the high reversal rate meant the original decisions could not be regarded as reliable.

MI5 Gave False Evidence to the Courts After an Officer Lied About What He Told the BBC →

In June 2020, a senior MI5 officer told a BBC journalist that Agent X was an MI5 informant. Less than two years later, MI5 gave the High Court a witness statement saying that had never happened. The statement was false. An investigation of 213 pages, published on 16 July, has now established that the officer who made the original disclosure knew throughout that he had done so and later fabricated an account denying it.

Government Says Its Defence Plan Will Support 60,000 More Jobs. Its Model Does Not Count the Jobs Lost Elsewhere →

The government says its Defence Investment Plan will support nearly 60,000 additional jobs by 2029/30. Its own methodology does not estimate how many jobs may disappear from the spending programmes being cut to pay for it. The Ministry of Defence made that limitation explicit in a methodology paper published on 8 July.

Starmer Committed £15bn to Defence. £4.7bn Had No Identified Funding Source Beyond Budget 2026 →

Keir Starmer announced an additional £15 billion of defence spending power over four years on 30 June. The Treasury's funding table published the same day identified where £10.3 billion would come from. Against the remaining £4.7 billion, it said only: "To be funded at Budget 2026."

Burnham Was Briefed on Starmer's Defence Plan but Not Told About the £4.7bn Budget Requirement, Reports Say →

Keir Starmer announced an additional £15 billion of defence spending power on 30 June. The Treasury's financing table identified measures worth £10.3 billion. Multiple outlets reported the same account: Burnham had been briefed on the plan but had not been told about the £4.7 billion funding requirement before it emerged publicly.

96 Days After Saying Work Would Begin on the A38 and A46, Government Put Both at Risk to Fund Defence →

On 26 March, the government's Road Investment Strategy said work would begin on the A38 Derby Junctions and A46 Newark Bypass during the road period of five years. After 96 days, the Defence Investment Plan funding document named both as candidates for cancellation. Neither has entered its main construction contract. No final decision has been taken.