Renters’ Rights Act 2025
A Bill to make provision changing the law about rented homes, including provision abolishing fixed term assured tenancies and assured shorthold tenancies; imposing obligations on landlords and others in relation to rented homes and temporary and supported accommodation; and for connected purposes.
supported by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage.
How would you vote on this bill?
Votes cast on this site by visitors who chose to vote. They are not a poll of the public.
Commons division: Renters' Rights Bill: Third Reading, 14 January 2025
46 percentage points, a wide gap
Outcome mismatch: site voters would block this bill, but MPs passed it in this division.
How the Lords voted
18 formal votes in the House of Lords on this bill, newest first.
These are the occasions when peers formally divided and every vote was recorded. Most decisions in the Lords, including on many amendments, are agreed without a recorded vote, so they do not appear here.
- 14 October 2025Government won
Baroness Scott of Bybrook moved Motion H1, as an amendment to Motion H, to leave out from “House” to end and insert “do insist on its Amendment 53”.
Peers' vote381 peersContent · 169Not content · 212Labour 0 content, 145 not content · Conservative 143 content, 0 not content · Liberal Democrat 0 content, 47 not content · Crossbench 19 content, 12 not content · Non-affiliated 3 content, 4 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 2 content, 0 not content · Green Party 0 content, 2 not content · Plaid Cymru 0 content, 2 not content · Ulster Unionist Party 2 content, 0 not content
- 14 October 2025Government won
Lord Cromwell moved Motion C1, as an amendment to Motion C, to leave out from “House” to end and insert “do insist on its Amendment 18”.
Peers' vote419 peersContent · 204Not content · 215Conservative 163 content, 0 not content · Labour 1 content, 151 not content · Liberal Democrat 0 content, 49 not content · Crossbench 36 content, 8 not content · Non-affiliated 3 content, 3 not content · Green Party 0 content, 2 not content · Plaid Cymru 0 content, 2 not content · Ulster Unionist Party 1 content, 0 not content
- 14 October 2025Government won
Lord de Clifford moved Motion A1, as an amendment to Motion A, at end to insert “, and do propose Amendment 11B in lieu, 11B Clause 11, page 19, line 28, at end insert, “16D Pet damage deposit (1) It is an implied term of every assured tenancy to which section 16A applies that if, at the time of consenting to the tenant keeping a pet, the landlord informs the tenant in writing that the payment of an additional pet damage deposit by the tenant is a condition of the consent, then the tenant must comply with that condition. (2) The additional pet damage deposit under subsection (1), (a) can be used to make good pet damage, (b) must be of equivalent value to a minimum of one weeks of rent and a maximum of three weeks of rent, depending on the nature of the pet, at the landlord's discretion acting reasonably, (c) cannot be subject to the limits for deposits in tenancy agreements, and (d) is subject to the rules governing deposits in tenancy agreements, for purposes of monies handled.””
Peers' vote431 peersContent · 192Not content · 239Conservative 162 content, 2 not content · Labour 0 content, 151 not content · Liberal Democrat 0 content, 50 not content · Crossbench 23 content, 26 not content · Non-affiliated 4 content, 4 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 0 content, 3 not content · Ulster Unionist Party 3 content, 0 not content · Green Party 0 content, 2 not content · Plaid Cymru 0 content, 1 not content
- 15 July 2025Government won
Baroness Scott of Bybrook moved amendment 118, after clause 136, to insert the new clause Report of the impact of this Act on the housing market.
Peers' vote254 peersContent · 106Not content · 148Labour 0 content, 138 not content · Conservative 73 content, 0 not content · Liberal Democrat 21 content, 0 not content · Crossbench 9 content, 8 not content · Non-affiliated 2 content, 0 not content · Bishops 0 content, 1 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 1 content, 0 not content · Green Party 0 content, 1 not content
- 15 July 2025Government won
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage moved amendment 111, in clause 126, page 156, line 26, after “subsection (3)” to insert “or (3A)”.
Peers' vote367 peersContent · 214Not content · 153Labour 144 content, 0 not content · Conservative 0 content, 143 not content · Liberal Democrat 49 content, 0 not content · Crossbench 16 content, 2 not content · Non-affiliated 2 content, 5 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 1 content, 2 not content · Bishops 1 content, 0 not content · Green Party 1 content, 0 not content · Ulster Unionist Party 0 content, 1 not content
Show 13 earlier Lords votes
- 15 July 2025Government won
Lord Cromwell moved amendment 110, after clause 113, to insert the new clause Offences under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977: report.
Peers' vote246 peersContent · 98Not content · 148Labour 0 content, 143 not content · Liberal Democrat 52 content, 0 not content · Crossbench 37 content, 3 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 4 content, 0 not content · Non-affiliated 2 content, 2 not content · Bishops 1 content, 0 not content · Green Party 1 content, 0 not content · Plaid Cymru 1 content, 0 not content
- 15 July 2025Government defeated
Baroness Grender moved amendment 106, in clause 101, page 134, line 13, at end to insert, “(iii) that is provided by the Ministry of Defence for use as service family accommodation.”
Peers' vote440 peersContent · 282Not content · 158Conservative 172 content, 0 not content · Labour 0 content, 148 not content · Liberal Democrat 54 content, 0 not content · Crossbench 41 content, 7 not content · Non-affiliated 6 content, 2 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 4 content, 0 not content · Green Party 2 content, 0 not content · Ulster Unionist Party 2 content, 0 not content · Bishops 1 content, 0 not content · Plaid Cymru 0 content, 1 not content
- 15 July 2025Government won
Baroness Scott of Bybrook moved amendment 98, in clause 92, page 126, line 13, at beginning to insert “persistently”.
Peers' vote455 peersContent · 215Not content · 240Conservative 192 content, 0 not content · Labour 0 content, 148 not content · Liberal Democrat 0 content, 58 not content · Crossbench 12 content, 26 not content · Non-affiliated 6 content, 3 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 3 content, 0 not content · Green Party 0 content, 2 not content · Plaid Cymru 0 content, 2 not content · Ulster Unionist Party 2 content, 0 not content · Bishops 0 content, 1 not content
- 15 July 2025Government defeated
Lord Keen of Elie moved amendment 87, in clause 41, page 58, line 4, to leave out “on the balance of probabilities” and insert “beyond reasonable doubt”.
Peers' vote460 peersContent · 237Not content · 223Conservative 189 content, 0 not content · Labour 0 content, 143 not content · Liberal Democrat 0 content, 61 not content · Crossbench 36 content, 9 not content · Non-affiliated 6 content, 5 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 3 content, 1 not content · Ulster Unionist Party 3 content, 0 not content · Green Party 0 content, 2 not content · Plaid Cymru 0 content, 2 not content
- 7 July 2025Government defeated
Lord Young of Cookham moved amendment 59, in clause 14, page 24, line 28, at end to insert, “16GA Exemption for shared ownership leaseholders (1) Sections 16E and 16F do not apply to any relevant person who gives notice under Ground 1A in Schedule 2 if on the date such notice is given that person is a tenant under a shared ownership lease. (2) For the purposes of this section “shared ownership lease” has the same meaning as in section 13 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and “tenant” shall be construed accordingly.”
Peers' vote428 peersContent · 274Not content · 154Conservative 176 content, 0 not content · Labour 0 content, 144 not content · Liberal Democrat 57 content, 0 not content · Crossbench 23 content, 8 not content · Non-affiliated 9 content, 2 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 4 content, 0 not content · Plaid Cymru 2 content, 0 not content · Ulster Unionist Party 2 content, 0 not content · Green Party 1 content, 0 not content
- 7 July 2025Government defeated
Lord Pannick moved amendment 58, in clause 14, page 23, line 22, at end to insert“, or (iii) the dwelling house has been demonstrably available for purchase on the open market at a fair price for not less than six months and the landlord has not had any suitable offers to purchase the dwelling house. (1A) For the purposes of subsection (1)(b)(iii), the previous tenant or local authority retain the right for the courts to require evidence and to decide whether genuine attempts have been made to market and sell the property at a reasonable price and no offers at or above that price have been refused.”
Peers' vote422 peersContent · 213Not content · 209Conservative 175 content, 0 not content · Labour 0 content, 140 not content · Liberal Democrat 0 content, 55 not content · Crossbench 26 content, 7 not content · Non-affiliated 6 content, 4 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 4 content, 0 not content · Plaid Cymru 0 content, 2 not content · Ulster Unionist Party 2 content, 0 not content · Green Party 0 content, 1 not content
- 7 July 2025Government defeated
Lord de Clifford moved amendment 53A, in clause 11, page 19, line 28, at end to insert, “16D Pet damage deposit (1) It is an implied term of every assured tenancy to which section 16A applies that if, at the time of consenting to the tenant keeping a pet, the landlord informs the tenant in writing that the payment of an additional pet damage deposit by the tenant is a condition of the consent, then the tenant must comply with that condition. (2) The additional pet damage deposit under subsection (1), (a) can be used to make good pet damage, (b) must be of equivalent value to three weeks of rent, (c) cannot be subject to the limits for deposits in tenancy agreements, and (d) is subject to the rules governing deposits in tenancy agreements, for purposes of monies handled.”
Peers' vote404 peersContent · 206Not content · 198Conservative 169 content, 0 not content · Labour 0 content, 131 not content · Liberal Democrat 0 content, 52 not content · Crossbench 25 content, 8 not content · Non-affiliated 8 content, 4 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 3 content, 0 not content · Plaid Cymru 0 content, 2 not content · Green Party 0 content, 1 not content · Ulster Unionist Party 1 content, 0 not content
- 1 July 2025Government won
Baroness Scott of Bybrook moved amendment 43, in clause 8, page 12, line 23, after “for” insert “more than six months”.
Peers' vote126 peersContent · 23Not content · 103Labour 0 content, 93 not content · Conservative 15 content, 0 not content · Liberal Democrat 0 content, 8 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 6 content, 0 not content · Crossbench 1 content, 2 not content · Non-affiliated 1 content, 0 not content
- 1 July 2025Government won
Lord Carrington moved amendment 34, in clause 7, page 11, line 35, to leave out from “if” to end of line 36 and insert “the tribunal determines that the proposed rent is equal to or lower than the open-market rent, or”.
Peers' vote171 peersContent · 45Not content · 126Labour 1 content, 112 not content · Conservative 31 content, 0 not content · Liberal Democrat 0 content, 11 not content · Crossbench 5 content, 2 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 6 content, 0 not content · Non-affiliated 1 content, 1 not content · Ulster Unionist Party 1 content, 0 not content
- 1 July 2025Government won
Lord Jamieson moved amendment 23, in Schedule 1, page 194, line 7, at end to insert, “Possession for redevelopment and regeneration of private rented homes 24A After Ground 8 insert, “Ground 8A The following conditions are met, (a) the private landlord intends to redevelop the dwelling-house for the purpose of regeneration, and the proposed works cannot reasonably be carried out while the property is occupied; (b) the private landlord has complied with all relevant tenancy obligations up to the date of possession; (c) the private landlord has given six months’ notice; (d) a planning application has been made. In this Ground, “Redevelopment” means, (a) demolition or reconstruction of all or a substantial part of the dwelling-house, or (b) substantial works to the dwelling-house or any building of which it forms part; “Regeneration” means the process of improving an area through coordinated measures that either, (a) secure the redevelopment, refurbishment, or enhancement of land, buildings, or infrastructure, (b) promote economic growth, including through the creation of employment opportunities and support for local enterprise, or (c) advance social wellbeing by improving housing, public services, community facilities, and the overall quality of life for residents; “Private landlord” means a landlord who is not a registered provider of social housing.””
Peers' vote345 peersContent · 169Not content · 176Conservative 148 content, 0 not content · Labour 0 content, 120 not content · Liberal Democrat 0 content, 45 not content · Crossbench 9 content, 7 not content · Non-affiliated 5 content, 3 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 6 content, 0 not content · Plaid Cymru 0 content, 1 not content · Ulster Unionist Party 1 content, 0 not content
- 1 July 2025Government defeated
Lord de Clifford moved amendment 21, in Schedule 1, page 194, line 7, at end to insert, “New ground for possession for property which is required for a carer for the landlord or landlord’s family 24A After Ground 8 insert, “Ground 8A The landlord seeking possession requires the dwelling-house for the purpose of housing a person who is a carer for, (a) the landlord, (b) the landlord’s spouse, or (c) a member of the landlord’s family who is living with the landlord, where the dwelling-house is in sufficiently close proximity to the person requiring care to facilitate emergency callout. For the purposes of this Schedule, “carer” means an adult providing personal care or nursing care to another person, who may be under the age of 18, under a voluntary or contracted arrangement. The Secretary of State may by regulations amend the definition of carer above.””
Peers' vote367 peersContent · 230Not content · 137Conservative 156 content, 0 not content · Labour 0 content, 131 not content · Liberal Democrat 46 content, 0 not content · Crossbench 16 content, 3 not content · Non-affiliated 5 content, 3 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 5 content, 0 not content · Green Party 1 content, 0 not content · Ulster Unionist Party 1 content, 0 not content
- 1 July 2025Government defeated
Lord Carrington moved amendment 8, in Schedule 1, page 179, line 36, after “a” to insert “seasonal or permanent employee, worker or self-employed”.
Peers' vote403 peersContent · 253Not content · 150Conservative 164 content, 0 not content · Labour 0 content, 139 not content · Liberal Democrat 48 content, 2 not content · Crossbench 28 content, 7 not content · Non-affiliated 7 content, 2 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 5 content, 0 not content · Plaid Cymru 1 content, 0 not content
- 1 July 2025Government defeated
Baroness Scott of Bybrook moved amendment 5, in Schedule 1, page 178, to leave out line 13.
Peers' vote417 peersContent · 221Not content · 196Conservative 180 content, 0 not content · Labour 0 content, 133 not content · Liberal Democrat 0 content, 49 not content · Crossbench 29 content, 10 not content · Non-affiliated 6 content, 3 not content · Democratic Unionist Party 5 content, 0 not content · Green Party 1 content, 0 not content · Plaid Cymru 0 content, 1 not content
Lords votes last updated 17 October 2026. Source: UK Parliament Lords Votes API.
Sponsored by

Bill passage
Commons
- 1st reading11 Sept 2024
- 2nd reading9 Oct 2024
- Committee stage22 Oct 2024
- Report stage14 Jan 2025
- 3rd reading14 Jan 2025
Lords
- 1st reading15 Jan 2025
- 2nd reading4 Feb 2025
- Committee stage22 Apr 2025
- Report stage1 Jul 2025
- 3rd reading21 Jul 2025
